Which of the following actions is necessary to address a holding of abandonment based on office error?

To address a holding of abandonment based on office error, submitting a petition with evidence is necessary. When the USPTO determines a filing has been abandoned due to an error made by the office—such as a failure to properly record the status of the application or inform the applicant of necessary actions—the applicant can seek to rectify this through a formal petition. This formal process allows the applicant to provide evidence supporting the claim that the abandonment was not due to their actions, but rather due to an oversight by the USPTO.

This process is crucial because it formalizes the request to review the circumstances surrounding the abandonment. By presenting evidence, the applicant is able to substantiate their position and potentially revive the application. The USPTO has specific guidelines on how to file such a petition, and it is a key step in correcting the record and continuing the registration process.

Other options like filing a new application or contacting trademark examiners directly do not address the issue of reinstating the original application as effectively. A new application starts the trademark registration process over again, and contacting examiners does not constitute an official method to challenge the abandonment ruling. Requesting a survey of applicants is unrelated to addressing abandonment; it's not a recognized remedy for this situation.