Which statement about appointing a domestic representative is true?

The statement that you can waive the need for a domestic representative if living in the U.S. is accurate. In the context of U.S. trademark applications, a domestic representative (or attorney) is often required for applicants who are non-U.S. residents. However, for applicants who reside in the U.S., the Trademark Office allows for the waiver of this requirement, meaning they do not need to appoint a domestic representative or attorney in the same way that non-residents do.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for anyone filing a trademark application. Applicants living in the U.S. can manage their applications themselves without needing to designate a separate representative, streamlining the process for them. This flexibility recognizes that U.S. residents may already have a good understanding of the application processes and legalities involved.

Other statements focus on mandatory requirements for different categories of applicants. For instance, asserting that it is mandatory for all U.S. residents misunderstands the ability to waive this requirement. Similarly, saying that it's required for non-U.S. residents only points to a different situation that does not consider the flexibility offered to domestic applicants. The final statement incorrectly implies that regardless of the applicant's location, a domestic representative is always necessary, which contradicts the flexibility provided